elrhiarhodan: (Default)
[personal profile] elrhiarhodan
Playing catchup, my lovelies. Gad, do I HATE summer colds.

9 – Pairings – For each of the fandoms from day two, what are your three favorite pairings to write?

White Collar: This is easy:

Neal/Peter
Peter/Neal
Peter/Neal/Elizabeth

No - you didn’t misread. I don’t know if it’s a typical thing in a slash pairing to write the dominant partner first (as in D/s), but that’s the way I tend to roll, so Peter/Neal is different from Neal/Peter. And by Neal/Peter, I don’t mean that Peter is submissive to Neal - it’s just that the relationship has a different dynamic than Peter/Neal. I think I tend to reserve Neal/Peter for A/Us like Wings of Desire and a few others.

If I were to write, say XMFC - Erik/Charles, Farscape - John/Crais, John/Aeryn, Chiana/Zhaan, The West Wing - Josh/Sam.

10 – Pairings – Have you ever gone outside your comfort zone and written a pairing you liked, but found you couldn't write, or a pairing you didn't like, and found you could?

I do try to stretch myself. I enjoy odd pairings - Clinton/Mozzie, June/Bancroft, Sara/Peter. The Clinton/Mozzie pairing has an interesting painplay dynamic that I want to explore further.

I think the pairing that I’ve tried the hardest to write has been anything with Alex - I’ve warmed to the character, and I’ve written her solo several times, but I can’t put her in a room or in a bed with anyone. Dunno why.

11 – Genre – do you prefer certain genres of fic when you're writing? What kind do you tend to write most?

I think I like romance as a genre the most - both to write and to read. Almost all of my stories build around a romantic connection - whether they are porn or casefic or something entirely different.

I’ve also had a lot of fun in the fantasy genre (and we pause for a commercial interruption - if anyone is writing for Promptfest VI, know that I can be twisted into writing Vampire World with the right Peter/Neal prompt). The 61k epic I recently finished is perhaps the oddest thing I’ve even written, including Wings of Desire, but it’s not at all cracky (okay - other than for a few odd moments it’s not).

The genre I write the least is gen - not because I always want to write about sex - far from it. It’s just that, well, I don’t enjoy it. Maybe had I started writing fan fiction when I was much less mature, less worldly, I would have found that satisfying.

ETA (because, in addition to my waning headcold, I have a case of foot and mouth disease: I probably should have said that I came into fandom through slash, explored because of slash, and started writing because I wanted more slash. Gen and Slash has nothing to do with anyone's age or maturity level - it has to do with their personal preferences, full stop.

I’m not the type of writer who needs to be constrained by canon, hell - I wouldn’t be writing epic fantasies and fairytales if I was! I like my imagination, and I like to explore the whole sequence of “what if’s”.

12 – Have you ever attempted an "adaptation" fic of a favorite book or movie but set in a different fandom?

Hmmm - I think the closest think I’ve written that comes to that is the displacement of White Collar’s Pilot into a vampire fantasy.

And I’ve borrowed very heavily from certain classics for my Urban Fantasy epic. But that’s not a deliberate rewrite or adaption.

Date: 2011-07-09 09:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sahiya.livejournal.com
I'm puzzled by your definition of "gen." "Gen" doesn't necessarily mean canon-centered, it just means the story isn't pairing centered. I suppose I can see where you might get the idea that it means canon-centered, since a lot of gen writers would say that canon pairings are okay, but that isn't actually the point - a Peter/El story that focuses on their relationship still wouldn't be properly gen.

ETA: I also don't think that gen is the hallmark of immature or naive writers. I write a lot of gen and don't consider myself to be either, frankly.
Edited Date: 2011-07-09 09:44 pm (UTC)

Date: 2011-07-09 10:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daria234.livejournal.com
" But one of the arguments I read most often from gen writers (at least in WC) is that shipping a certain relationship (Peter/Neal, e.g.) is abhorrent not because its a pairing, but because it doesn't exist in canon. "

I have heard this too in various fandoms. It does not seem like a logical argument to me. It rather misses the point that nothing is fanfic is canon unless all you write is deleted scenes. (sorry, you said you wanted to save the argument for another time and I said it anyway, lol)

Some people actually do use "gen" to mean 'no mention of non-canon ships.' I don't see why that definition could be correct (and it seems to mostly be used that way in fandoms with only hetero relationships, so you wouldn't see a fic with Jack/Ianto called 'gen'). So by that def, casefic with Peter/El kissing when Peter is found safely would still be gen, but casefic with Neal in El's place would not be gen. Like I said, I don't get that definition.

Date: 2011-07-09 10:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aisle-one.livejournal.com
I tend to take those arguments as anti-slash.

In re gen fics, I think they're as difficult to execute as a well-conceived het or slash story. As a reader and writer of gen, I don't see any correlation between gen writers and maturity or naivette. Gen fics can also as deeply explore relationships as slash or het fics. I don't personally like to delineate fics as some genres being more superior than others because any type of story can be difficult to write.

Date: 2011-07-10 12:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aisle-one.livejournal.com
Thanks for clarifying in your post. I read what you said initially as value statements so it riled me up a little more on behalf of gen writers I love and respect rather than from personal offense since I write majority slash fics. I understand better now what you were trying to say.

And, incidentally, I don't consider your initial statements to be wanky nor my response to you. I appreciate that we can have an honest discussion when misunderstandings occur.

Date: 2011-07-09 10:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jrosemary.livejournal.com
I agree, Aisle One--and I don't think Elr meant to imply that writing gen is equivalent to immaturity. (And I write lots of WC gen--as long as you consider a father/son type of relationship between Peter and Neal as gen.)

I think Elr meant only that she wanted to play with canon from the beginning--and, yeah, slash and OT3 are intense ways of playing with the canon. Whereas, had she started when she was younger and less confident, she may have been afraid to tamper with canon to that extent and stuck to gen for that reason.

But, again, I agree that a well-executed gen fic is just as hard to pull off as any other, and that there is no hierarchy among the different types of fics--which is why I tend to love them all!

Date: 2011-07-09 10:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coffeethyme4me.livejournal.com
That's how I read it, too, J. I think some people find it more difficult or challenging to write relationships not explored in canon and some find it more difficult to stick with canon and do gen relationships and stories. It's all a matter of personal experience, and that's what I read her as saying. But I do know her pretty well and Goddess knows it's so easy to offend and be offended in this medium (haven't we all offended and been offended?) Personally, I think writing gen is hard as hell and I admire it greatly. One of the things I like about this fandom is that it does seem pretty good at being a mutual admiration society most of the time. I know Elr would NEVER bash a genre, a writing style, a person, a group, ever ever ever. She's a rock of this community, and one of the reasons it's so strong and loving.

GROUP HUG!!!!

:-)

Date: 2011-07-10 12:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aisle-one.livejournal.com
Thanks for your insight. And, yes, I do consider father/son Neal and Peter stories to be gen. I agree with [livejournal.com profile] sahiya's definition of gen fic to be stories that don't center on pairings. And I'm with you -- I love all sorts of stories. So long as they're well-written and well-executed, then I easily fall in love with them.

Date: 2011-07-09 10:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sahiya.livejournal.com
But one of the arguments I read most often from gen writers (at least in WC) is that shipping a certain relationship (Peter/Neal, e.g.) is abhorrent not because its a pairing, but because it doesn't exist in canon.

Hmm, yes. I have gotten the vibe from gen writers in WC fandom at times (not always, of course, there are strictly-gen writers in the fandom whom I adore) that what they are really trying to avoid is, as [livejournal.com profile] aisle_one says below, slash. Claiming to be canon purists is a wonderful way to do that. OTOH, I do know people who actually do read the Peter/Neal relationship as father/son and therefore find slash with them to be rather squicky. Personally speaking, I prefer an at least subtextually slashy interpretation, but I'm not opposed to others.

For me, whether a story I write is gen or not simply depends on what the story wants. I'm willing to go gen if a romantic relationship feels distracting or unnecessary, but I'm just as willing to write a romantic relationship if that's what is called for. I'm not married to canon by any means, and I've read totally gen AU's (not so much in WC, but definitely in Doctor Who) that were not at all canon-compliant but still weren't focused on 'ships of any kind.

Date: 2011-07-10 12:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aisle-one.livejournal.com
OTOH, I do know people who actually do read the Peter/Neal relationship as father/son and therefore find slash with them to be rather squicky.

I agree with this, too. One of my favorite WC writers just can't see Peter and Neal as anything but having a father/son relationship so she doesn't tend to read and definitely doesn't write Neal/Peter slash. But she's not opposed to slash as a general rule.

Profile

elrhiarhodan: (Default)
elrhiarhodan

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 16th, 2025 04:01 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios