elrhiarhodan: (Default)
[personal profile] elrhiarhodan
No obscure footballers or train stations today. The first random article was an obscure legal precedent. All I want to know, was tupping involved? Sadly, not. And I had posted this on DW this afternoon. The LJ blackout killed the crossposting.


Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheep-Breeders’ Association [1915] 1 Ch 881 is a UK company law case, concerning the proper interpretation of a company's articles, and whether a company member could be bound by its terms.

Facts

Article 49 said disputes between the association and a member should go to arbitration, before court. Mr Hickman complained about refusal to register his sheep in the published flock book and was under threat of being expelled. He started proceedings in the High Court and the association sought an injunction.

Judgment

Astbury J held that the articles prevented Mr Hickman: there was a contract. He was bound. The predecessor to the Companies Act 2006 section 33 creates a contract, which affects members in their capacity as members, though not in a special or personal capacity (eg as director). As a member, Mr Hickman was bound to comply with the company procedure for arbitrating disputes and could not resort to court.

Source: Wikipedia

Profile

elrhiarhodan: (Default)
elrhiarhodan

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 34 567
891011 121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 18th, 2025 10:42 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios